Politico puff piece about Susan Gibson (candidate who did porn)

[wct097]

Her Online Sex Life Was Exposed. She Lost Her Election. Now She’s Speaking Out.

Susanna Gibson’s campaign was rocked when an opponent exposed her private digital life to the public. She won’t be the last.

www.politico.com

Being in VA, I remember when this came out. This article basically amplifies her claim that she didn't know it happened and didn't consent to the "video being recorded". That seems completely impossible as the Post reported and showed screenshots of her talking to the camera asking people for tips and typing on the computer responding to people. It also claims this was "a dropbox file" that was accessed without consent. Those two claims, on their face, seem mutually exclusive.

Now she's on a campaign against "revenge porn"? So now "revenue porn" is defined as sharing links to porn a Democrat streamed live online?

Here's a better headline and position; "She had sex with her husband. Who cares?"

Why lie and turn it into a victimhood thing?

 

[John]

Link to video?

 

[wct097]

Link to video?

Dunno if it's up anywhere. I didn't watch it, but you can Google her name and "sex tape" and see semi-safe for work stills that show her clearly interacting with the laptop/camera.

 

[Jerk!]

why is this in the public forum

 

[JLS]

so people can find it in searches



organic SEO

 

[wct097]

why is this in the public forum

Politico should be publicly shamed for shill pieces like this.

 

[abqtj]

Her Online Sex Life Was Exposed. She Lost Her Election. Now She’s Speaking Out.

Susanna Gibson’s campaign was rocked when an opponent exposed her private digital life to the public. She won’t be the last.

www.politico.com

Being in VA, I remember when this came out. This article basically amplifies her claim that she didn't know it happened and didn't consent to the "video being recorded". That seems completely impossible as the Post reported and showed screenshots of her talking to the camera asking people for tips and typing on the computer responding to people. It also claims this was "a dropbox file" that was accessed without consent. Those two claims, on their face, seem mutually exclusive.

Now she's on a campaign against "revenge porn"? So now "revenue porn" is defined as sharing links to porn a Democrat streamed live online?

Here's a better headline and position; "She had sex with her husband. Who cares?"

Why lie and turn it into a victimhood thing?

You’ve jumped to quite a few conclusions based on your own hypothesis and nothing from the facts of the article you shared.

“Candidate who did porn” in your title is rather contradictory to what’s in the article, don’t you think?

Also…why are you even sharing this?


Sent from my PalmPilot

 

[abqtj]

Sent from my PalmPilot

 

[JLS]

Spoiler: NSFW

Susanna Gibson!!! new sextape trending leaked fucking so hot... - Porn DH Video

probably NSFW

 

[Hooligan]

It's a Q&A piece, so I'm not sure it's really a puff piece. That said, this woman is delusional if she thought she could live stream herself having sex and expect nobody to notice or remember.

 

[John]

so people can find it in searches



organic SEO

It was the obvious joke bro. I’m surprised that no one said it first.

 

[wct097]

You’ve jumped to quite a few conclusions based on your own hypothesis and nothing from the facts of the article you shared.

“Candidate who did porn” in your title is rather contradictory to what’s in the article, don’t you think?

It's not jumping to conclusions and is contradictory. That's the point. You can google up screenshots that clearly demonstrate why it is contradictory and why the article is problematic. To side with the article, you have to completely ignore all of the readily available evidence and the original article from the Post that this article is addressing.

 

[abqtj]

It's not jumping to conclusions and is contradictory. That's the point. You can google up screenshots that clearly demonstrate why it is contradictory and why the article is problematic. To side with the article, you have to completely ignore all of the readily available evidence and the original article from the Post that this article is addressing.

But you only linked the article, how am I supposed to support your side with no evidence being presented?

You’d make a terrible juror

 

[pirranah]

How dare she do such a thing with her husband. Doesn't she know she's suppose to be banging randoes from her campaign tour!

 

[wct097]

LoL