50 Years Ago, Sugar Industry Quietly Paid Scientists To Point Blame At Fat The Two-Way NPR
Read this. While a genius move for the sugar companies- wonder how many lives were lost, how many billions were wasted over the decades because "the science was settled" that fats were the problem?
Think to yourself- how is it that scientists, people who are held to some higher standard in our minds, as if scientists are above reproach, were able to create the results the people paying them wanted them to create?
How was the money trail kept quiet for so long? Even 20 years ago people who started claiming fats weren't the problem, sugar was, were still considered kooks. Atkins is still considered a "fad" diet.
So we know, it can be done. Unseen forces can manipulate scientists and science to make the false seem true. Science then has its own ways of silencing those that do not agree with the science of the times- though there is hope eventually the truth comes out- the truth can be painfully slow.
So after reading this, tell me again how it is crazy to believe climate science isn't being paid by a rich interest (Russia has the most to gain) to overstate the effects of manmade global warming? Why is that so crazy? It's been done before. 40 years ago you'd be crazy to blame health issues on sugar not fats. Will it take another 40 years before the politics of climate change finally come to light? At the very least you can't read this without the realization that scientists can get whatever results you pay them to get.
Read this. While a genius move for the sugar companies- wonder how many lives were lost, how many billions were wasted over the decades because "the science was settled" that fats were the problem?
Think to yourself- how is it that scientists, people who are held to some higher standard in our minds, as if scientists are above reproach, were able to create the results the people paying them wanted them to create?
How was the money trail kept quiet for so long? Even 20 years ago people who started claiming fats weren't the problem, sugar was, were still considered kooks. Atkins is still considered a "fad" diet.
So we know, it can be done. Unseen forces can manipulate scientists and science to make the false seem true. Science then has its own ways of silencing those that do not agree with the science of the times- though there is hope eventually the truth comes out- the truth can be painfully slow.
So after reading this, tell me again how it is crazy to believe climate science isn't being paid by a rich interest (Russia has the most to gain) to overstate the effects of manmade global warming? Why is that so crazy? It's been done before. 40 years ago you'd be crazy to blame health issues on sugar not fats. Will it take another 40 years before the politics of climate change finally come to light? At the very least you can't read this without the realization that scientists can get whatever results you pay them to get.