What business is it of the court's?
I detest people who constantly complain about "wasting taxpayer money" when a government is doing its job. This trial didn't cost the "taxpayer" any more than if they had been hearing another case.Complete and utter waste of taxpayer money.
Should a parent take a coach to federal court because the coach benched their kid?I detest people who constantly complain about "wasting taxpayer money" when a government is doing its job. This trial didn't cost the "taxpayer" any more than if they had been hearing another case.
But they should never have heard it to begin with. It has nothing to do with the federal government.I detest people who constantly complain about "wasting taxpayer money" when a government is doing its job. This trial didn't cost the "taxpayer" any more than if they had been hearing another case.
not comparableShould a parent take a coach to federal court because the coach benched their kid?
Actually, it does with the players UNION involvementBut they should never have heard it to begin with. It has nothing to do with the federal government.
What? You mean to tell me that if I take a nice, soft, leathery football out of a 70 degree room, and leave it outside in the cold with a bunch of 300 lb men banging into it, that it might lose air pressure. Ridonkulous.It'll be funny when teams play in cold weather at end of season and they find "deflated" balls.
I'm not saying that it wasn't following protocol. I'm simply saying that it is a shame that something this trivial wound up in a federal court.I detest people who constantly complain about "wasting taxpayer money" when a government is doing its job. This trial didn't cost the "taxpayer" any more than if they had been hearing another case.
where else would work related litigation go?I'm not saying that it wasn't following protocol. I'm simply saying that it is a shame that something this trivial wound up in a federal court.
I figured Obama would have created a Football Czar by now.where else would work related litigation go?
Momjeans only cares about basketball.I figured Obama would have created a Football Czar by now.
The contract no doubt has means of resolving disputes and if the resolution is that the commissioner makes the final decision, then that should be where it stops. No one involved here is fighting for their livelihood. It's just how much more money does a rich person get. Should have been laughed out of court. If you don't like the NFL's decision, don't play for the NFL.It's a contract dispute with parties from different states. Hence the involvement of the federal courts. Simple. It is a legitimate function of government. Not to mention, it ain't like it's free to file a court case.