WJoperator [JU]
Archived
I cannot believe the way the fishies always jump into the nets on this subject. It's one of the oldest trolls in the book, yet it just continues to resurface, and just keeps working.
:hush:When and where did you take yours?
I even had another thread running showing a pic of a part of my gun collection. You just have to drop the line in the water. It is funny to play the other side, much easier to defend that position... but then it is always easier to argue for losing rights than defending them.I cannot believe the way the fishies always jump into the nets on this subject. It's one of the oldest trolls in the book, yet it just continues to resurface, and just keeps working.
Without any guns, the police will be in no better shape than anyone else. Besides, the ratio of people/police is about 1700/1. This means a policeman can spend about 51 seconds a day on each person he's responsible for...assuming that he never sleeps or takes time off.If there weren't any guns, they would have the resources.
Irrelevant. Tanks won't be going door-to-door trying to conduct illegal search and seizures.The Iraqis find that IEDs are more effective than guns against the US Gubment. You aren't going to take out a tank with grandpas 12ga.
Since people aren't getting assaulted and robbed every 52 seconds, I am sure it is enough.Without any guns, the police will be in no better shape than anyone else. Besides, the ratio of people/police is about 1700/1. This means a policeman can spend about 51 seconds a day on each person he's responsible for...assuming that he never sleeps or takes time off.
David Koresh's ghost says different.Irrelevant. Tanks won't be going door-to-door trying to conduct illegal search and seizures.
Where'd you get that stat? Same place you pulled the "thousands of children that die as a result of gun violence everyday"?Since people aren't getting assaulted and robbed every 52 seconds, I am sure it is enough.
Janet Reno scares me.David Koresh's ghost says different.
I think there is a certain merit to your contention. . .[in a civilized society] and should be collected in a house to house search.
Not buying a gun myself does not remove the millions from society that take innocent lives everyday. As badjeep says above, a handgun has no legitimate purpose.Here is the simple answer to all of this...
If you don't like guns, don't buy them, and certainly don't preach to gun owners that they should not own theirs. We(gun owners) don't tell you that you should go buy something you do not like, or to give up something you do. That is all.
BTW I'm Jon from PA, I drive Jeeps and shoot guns, I'm a bad human.
much like this thread...a handgun has no legitimate purpose.
they do cut down on the chances of missing your target.....however it would get old toting a shotty around with ya everywhere.Fact
all we need are shotguns
FACT
wat's even better is admitting a troll and watching folks continue toI even had another thread running showing a pic of a part of my gun collection. You just have to drop the line in the water. It is funny to play the other side, much easier to defend that position... but then it is always easier to argue for losing rights than defending them.
BSAs badjeep says above, a handgun has no legitimate purpose.
wat's even better is admitting a troll and watching folks continue to
I even had another thread running showing a pic of a part of my gun collection. You just have to drop the line in the water. It is funny to play the other side, much easier to defend that position... but then it is always easier to argue for losing rights than defending them.
think that will stop this thread......wat's even better is admitting a troll and watching folks continue to